NOTES for the cardia: antireflux therapy via transluminal access

Background and study aims: The current standard for surgical antireflux therapy is laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, but natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) enables even less invasive access to the peritoneal cavity. We therefore aimed to evaluate a NOTES approach to antireflux therapy.

Patients and methods: An animal study including 24 pigs (16 nonsurvival and eight survival). After the peritoneal cavity had been accessed via the rectosigmoid, the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) was laid open using conventional endoscopic instruments. Thereafter, a transcutaneously introduced hook was used for tunneling and lifting of the distal esophagus. Finally, an antireflux ring was placed around the cardia. Animals were observed over 10 days in the survival series. Correct application of the prosthesis, adverse events as a result of the procedure, and bacterial contamination were evaluated by autopsy.

Results: The esophagogastric junction was strengthened by applying the ring prosthesis in 22 of 24 animals. Four bleeding episodes were observed, three of which were handled endoscopically. Correct placement of the prosthesis was accomplished in 21 of 22 animals. In the survival series, 1 pig died after transhiatal herniation of the stomach, and 1 pig suffered from peritonitis due to intraoperative contamination. In 7 of the 8 survival animals, no bacterial growth was noted by smear culture. The intervention had to be performed as a hybrid NOTES procedure in all cases.

Conclusion: Exposure of the GEJ and placement of an antireflux prosthesis via a hybrid NOTES procedure is feasible, despite some complications. This approach may be considered as a basis for optimization and further development of pure NOTES antireflux procedures.

References

• 1 Dent J, El-Serag H B, Wallander M A, Johansson S. Epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review.  Gut. 2005;  54 710-717
• 2 Schwartz M P, Smout A J. Review article: The endoscopic treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;  26 Suppl 2 1-6
• 3 Chen D, Barber C, McLoughlin P. et al . Systematic review of endoscopic treatments for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.  Br J Surg. 2009;  96 128-136
• 4 Watson D I. Laparoscopic treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2004;  18 19-35
• 5 Mehta S, Bennett J, Mahon D, Rhodes M. Prospective trial of laparoscopic nissen fundoplication versus proton pump inhibitor therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease: Seven-year follow-up.  J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;  10 1312-1316; discussion 1316 – 1317
• 6 Vakil N. Review article: the role of surgery in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;  25 1365-1372
• 7 Vakil N, Canga 3rd C. An overview of the success and failure of surgical therapy: standards against which the outcome of endoscopic therapy is measured.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2003;  13 69-73, viii
• 8 Kozarek R A, Low D E, Raltz S L. Complications associated with laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery: one multispecialty clinic’s experience.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  46 527-531
• 9 Swanstrom L, Wayne R. Spectrum of gastrointestinal symptoms after laparoscopic fundoplication.  Am J Surg. 1994;  167 538-541
• 10 Richards W O, Houston H L, Torquati A. et al . Paradigm shift in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.  Ann Surg. 2003;  237 638-647; discussion 648 – 639
• 11 Kalloo A N, Singh V K, Jagannath S B. et al . Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 114-117
• 12 McGee M F, Rosen M J, Marks J. et al . A primer on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: building a new paradigm.  Surg Innov. 2006;  13 86-93
• 13 Rattner D W. NOTES: Where have we been and where are we going?.  Surg Endosc. 2008;  22 1143-1145
• 14 Angelchik J P, Cohen R. A new surgical procedure for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux and hiatal hernia.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1979;  148 246-248
• 15 Haugen H, Aigner J, Brunner M, Wintermantel E. A novel processing method for injection-molded polyether-urethane scaffolds. Part 2: cellular interactions.  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006;  77 73-78
• 16 Wilhelm D, Meining A, Delius S von. et al . An innovative, safe and sterile sigmoid access (ISSA) for NOTES.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 401-406
• 17 Sakamoto N, Beppu K, Matsumoto K. et al . “Loop Clip”, a new closure device for large mucosal defects after EMR and ESD.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 E97-E98
• 18 Bergstrom M, Ikeda K, Swain P, Park P O. Transgastric anastomosis by using flexible endoscopy in a porcine model (with video).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 307-312
• 19 Kantsevoy S V, Jagannath S B, Niiyama H. et al . Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 287-292
• 20 Merrifield B F, Wagh M S, Thompson C C. Peroral transgastric organ resection: a feasibility study in pigs.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 693-697
• 21 Mintz Y, Horgan S, Savu M K. et al . Hybrid natural orifice transluminal surgery (NOTES) sleeve gastrectomy: a feasibility study using an animal model.  Surg Endosc. 2008;  22 1798-1802
• 22 Rosch T. Who votes for NOTES?.  Gut. 2008;  57 1481-1486
• 23 Bonavina L, Saino G I, Bona D. et al . Magnetic augmentation of the lower esophageal sphincter: results of a feasibility clinical trial.  J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;  12 2133-2140
• 24 Cadiere G B, Van Sante N, Graves J E. et al . Two-year results of a feasibility study on antireflux transoral incisionless fundoplication using EsophyX.  Surg Endosc. 2009;  23 957-964
• 25 Chuttani R, Sud R, Sachdev G. et al . A novel endoscopic full-thickness plicator for the treatment of GERD: A pilot study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  58 770-776
• 26 Hill A D, Walsh T N, Bolger C M. et al . Randomized controlled trial comparing Nissen fundoplication and the Angelchik prosthesis.  Br J Surg. 1994;  81 72-74
• 27 Deakin M, Mayer D, Temple J G. Surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux: the Angelchik prosthesis compared to the floppy Nissen fundoplication. Two-year follow-up study and a five-year evaluation of the Angelchik prosthesis.  Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1989;  71 249-252
• 28 Gourley G R, Pellett J R, Li B U, Adkins Jr. W N. A prospective randomized double-blind study of gastroesophageal reflux surgery in pediatric-sized developmentally disabled patients: Nissen fundoplication versus Angelchik prosthesis.  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1986;  5 52-61
• 29 Kmiot W A, Kirby R M, Akinola D, Temple J G. Prospective randomized trial of Nissen fundoplication and Angelchik prosthesis in the surgical treatment of medically refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.  Br J Surg. 1991;  78 1181-1184
• 30 Stuart R C, Dawson K, Keeling P. et al . A prospective randomized trial of Angelchik prosthesis versus Nissen fundoplication.  Br J Surg. 1989;  76 86-89
• 31 Bonavina L, DeMeester T, Mason R. et al . Mechanical effect of the Angelchik prosthesis on the competency of the gastric cardia: pathophysiologic implications and surgical perspectives.  Dis Esophagus. 1997;  10 115-118
• 32 Varshney S, Kelly J J, Branagan G. et al . Angelchik prosthesis revisited.  World J Surg. 2002;  26 129-133
• 33 Delgado S, Ibarzabal A, Fernandez-Esparrach G. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: current situation.  Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;  31 515-521
• 34 Meining A, Wilhelm D, Burian M. et al . Development, standardization, and evaluation of NOTES cholecystectomy using a transsigmoid approach in the porcine model: an acute feasibility study.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 860-864
• 35 Pai R D, Fong D G, Bundga M E. et al . Transcolonic endoscopic cholecystectomy: a NOTES survival study in a porcine model (with video).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  64 428-434
• 36 Rolanda C, Lima E, Pego J M. et al . Third-generation cholecystectomy by natural orifices: transgastric and transvesical combined approach (with video).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 111-117
• 37 Rattner D, Kalloo A. ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery. October 2005.  Surg Endosc. 2006;  20 329-333
• 38 Narula V K, Hazey J W, Renton D B. et al . Transgastric instrumentation and bacterial contamination of the peritoneal cavity.  Surg Endosc. 2008;  22 605-611
• 39 Bachman S L, Sporn E, Furrer J L. et al . Colonic sterilization for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures: a comparison of two decontamination protocols.  Surg Endosc. 2009;  23 1854-1859
• 40 Denk P M, Swanstrom L L, Whiteford M H. Transanal endoscopic microsurgical platform for natural orifice surgery.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  68 954-959
• 41 Fong D G, Pai R D, Thompson C C. Transcolonic endoscopic abdominal exploration: a NOTES survival study in a porcine model.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 312-318
• 42 Fong D G, Ryou M, Pai R D. et al . Transcolonic ventral wall hernia mesh fixation in a porcine model.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 865-869
• 43 Miedema B W, Bachman S L, Sporn E. et al . Transgastric placement of biologic mesh to the anterior abdominal wall.  Surg Endosc. 2009;  23 1212-1218
• 44 Sherwinter D A, Eckstein J G. Feasibility study of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery inguinal hernia repair.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  70 126-130